You sure did.
Text continuency: I seem to recall the last two panels read differently to follow on with the 5th’s mention of Ransom. Something about suggesting her own ransom. Looks like you may have changed it to cover a strategic asset instead and may wish to adjust that 5th panel to match. Maybe “What, no demands?”
Your right. We changed it to “strategic asset” to more closely fit how Ina thinks.
Demands are themselves a form of using a strategic asset, so they still match up in my mind.
No need for Bushido, or consistency.