Comments

Features these Characters

Belongs to these Storylines

|

286

Published on by

6 responses to “286”

  1. John Smith says:

    You sure did.

  2. charles81 says:

    Text continuency: I seem to recall the last two panels read differently to follow on with the 5th’s mention of Ransom. Something about suggesting her own ransom. Looks like you may have changed it to cover a strategic asset instead and may wish to adjust that 5th panel to match. Maybe “What, no demands?”

    • jwkovell says:

      Your right. We changed it to “strategic asset” to more closely fit how Ina thinks.

      Demands are themselves a form of using a strategic asset, so they still match up in my mind.

  3. This guy says:

    No need for Bushido, or consistency.

  4. Nos Rin aka CTCO says:

    mm, nice.

  5. Quiet Mastermind says:

    Aho🤦🏾‍♂️

Leave a Reply

-285 286